DICKINSON v. MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, 13-5022. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140404i22
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER JUAN R. S NCHEZ, Judge. AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2014, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants Millersville University of Pennsylvania (Millersville), Louis P. DeSol, and Roger Bruszewski's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 9) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: • Summary judgment is DENIED as to Dickinson's Title VII claim against Millersville. • Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to all claims asserted against DeSol and
Summary: ORDER JUAN R. S NCHEZ, Judge. AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2014, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants Millersville University of Pennsylvania (Millersville), Louis P. DeSol, and Roger Bruszewski's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 9) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: • Summary judgment is DENIED as to Dickinson's Title VII claim against Millersville. • Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to all claims asserted against DeSol and ..
More
ORDER
JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, Judge.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2014, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants Millersville University of Pennsylvania (Millersville), Louis P. DeSol, and Roger Bruszewski's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 9) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
• Summary judgment is DENIED as to Dickinson's Title VII claim against Millersville.
• Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to all claims asserted against DeSol and Bruszewski individually. Judgment is entered in favor of DeSol and Bruszewski and against Dickinson on Count Two of the Complaint.
Source: Leagle
