Smith v. Kershentsef, 18-3840. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190213d51
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 11th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) and Plaintiff's Response (ECF No. 8), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 2) is DISMISSED . It is further ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Magnuson-Moss Warranty claim is dismissed with prejudice; 2. Plaintiff's FDCPA claim is dismissed without prejudice; 3. Jurisdiction over Plaintiff's suppl
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 11th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) and Plaintiff's Response (ECF No. 8), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 2) is DISMISSED . It is further ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Magnuson-Moss Warranty claim is dismissed with prejudice; 2. Plaintiff's FDCPA claim is dismissed without prejudice; 3. Jurisdiction over Plaintiff's supple..
More
ORDER
GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, District Judge.
This 11th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) and Plaintiff's Response (ECF No. 8), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 2) is DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Magnuson-Moss Warranty claim is dismissed with prejudice;
2. Plaintiff's FDCPA claim is dismissed without prejudice;
3. Jurisdiction over Plaintiff's supplemental state law claims is denied.
Source: Leagle
