Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Boockvar, 1:19-CV-622. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191216d80
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 12) to dismiss by defendants, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion (Doc. 12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. Defendants' motion (Doc. 12) is GRANTED to the extent the Public Interest
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 12) to dismiss by defendants, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion (Doc. 12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. Defendants' motion (Doc. 12) is GRANTED to the extent the Public Interest L..
More
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 12) to dismiss by defendants, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motion (Doc. 12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
a. Defendants' motion (Doc. 12) is GRANTED to the extent the Public Interest Legal Foundation's request for records includes records containing protected personal information obtained by the Department of Motor Vehicles in connection with a motor vehicle record as defined in the Driver's Privacy Protection Act.
b. Defendants' motion (Doc. 12) is otherwise DENIED.
Source: Leagle
