BARBIERI v. WELLS FARGO & CO., 09-3196. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120731a54
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK, Judge. AND NOW this 27 th day of July , 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definitive Statement (ECF No. 13), Plaintiffs' Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Motion to Amend Its Complaint to Include Additional Counts Including but not Limited to R.I.C.O. Violations of the Racketeering Influence Corrupt Organizati
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK, Judge. AND NOW this 27 th day of July , 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definitive Statement (ECF No. 13), Plaintiffs' Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Motion to Amend Its Complaint to Include Additional Counts Including but not Limited to R.I.C.O. Violations of the Racketeering Influence Corrupt Organizatio..
More
ORDER
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, Judge.
AND NOW this 27th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definitive Statement (ECF No. 13), Plaintiffs' Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Motion to Amend Its Complaint to Include Additional Counts Including but not Limited to R.I.C.O. Violations of the Racketeering Influence Corrupt Organization Acts (ECF No. 14), and Defendants' Motion for Issuance of a Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Resolution of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 18), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiffs' Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Amend its Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
A. Plaintiffs' request to amend the Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file an amended Complaint on or before August 10, 2012.
B. Plaintiffs' request for an extension of time to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DISMISSED as moot.
C. Plaintiffs' request for expedited discovery is DENIED.
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definitive Statement (ECF No. 13) is DISMISSED as moot.
3. Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Resolution of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
