Chamberlain v. Wyoming County, 3:16-1408. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20181114h36
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER MALACHY E. MANNION , District Judge . In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The defendant County' motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 28) , is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART . (2) The County's motion is DENIED with respect to plaintiff's disparate treatment disability discrimination claims against the County under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and under the ADA, Counts 1and 6 of her amended complaint, (Doc. 15)
Summary: ORDER MALACHY E. MANNION , District Judge . In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The defendant County' motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 28) , is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART . (2) The County's motion is DENIED with respect to plaintiff's disparate treatment disability discrimination claims against the County under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and under the ADA, Counts 1and 6 of her amended complaint, (Doc. 15) ...
More
ORDER
MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge.
In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
(1) The defendant County' motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 28), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
(2) The County's motion is DENIED with respect to plaintiff's disparate treatment disability discrimination claims against the County under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and under the ADA, Counts 1and 6 of her amended complaint, (Doc. 15).
(3) The County's motion is GRANTED as to plaintiff's failure to accommodate claims under the RA and the ADA, Counts 2 and 7.
(4) The County's motion is GRANTED as to plaintiff's retaliation claims under the RA and the ADA, Counts 3 and 8.
(5) The County's motion is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's ADEA claim, Count 9.
(6) The County's motion is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's FMLA claims in Counts 4 and 5 alleging interference and retaliation.
(7) The County's motion with respect to the issue of damages under the FMLA is DENIED A MOOT.
Source: Leagle
