United States v. Manigault, 17-90-01. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190813815
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK , District Judge . AND NOW, this 9 th day of August , 2019, upon consideration of Defendant, Mark Manigault's Motion in Limine to Limit Testimony and Video Evidence (ECF No. 155), and the Government's Response in opposition thereto (ECF No. 156), and after a hearing in open court, it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant, Mark Manigault's Motion in Limine to Limit Testimony and Video Evidence (ECF No. 155), and the Government's Response in opposition thereto (ECF No. 156), and after a hearing in open court, it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
