MALOY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 08-3912. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120222d47
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge. AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant City of Philadelphia's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 26) and all documents and exhibits submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Counts V and VI of the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 4). 2. Defendant's Motion is DENIED as to Counts I, II, III, IV and VII of the Amended Complaint. IT IS
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge. AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant City of Philadelphia's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 26) and all documents and exhibits submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Counts V and VI of the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 4). 2. Defendant's Motion is DENIED as to Counts I, II, III, IV and VII of the Amended Complaint. IT IS ..
More
ORDER
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant City of Philadelphia's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 26) and all documents and exhibits submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Counts V and VI of the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 4).
2. Defendant's Motion is DENIED as to Counts I, II, III, IV and VII of the Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
