CROW v. BROOKS MOTOR CO., 3:13-cv-00757-ST. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20141231c07
Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#60) on November 10, 2014, in which she recommends this Court deny Defendants' Motion (#24) for Summary Judgment. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record d
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#60) on November 10, 2014, in which she recommends this Court deny Defendants' Motion (#24) for Summary Judgment. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de..
More
ORDER
ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#60) on November 10, 2014, in which she recommends this Court deny Defendants' Motion (#24) for Summary Judgment. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#60). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion (#24) for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
