ORDER

YVETTE KANE, District Judge.

On March 16, 2016, Magistrate Judge Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 115), in which he recommends that the Court grant the remaining defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 64), and close this case. Magistrate Judge Carlson based his recommendation on his finding that the remaining defendants, law enforcement officers who conducted an initial traffic stop of Plaintiff and subsequently detained him for a number of hours based on a fear that he posed a public safety risk, are entitled to qualified immunity because they did not violate Plaintiff's clearly established constitutional rights. (See Doc. No. 115.)

Plaintiff has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, arguing that (1) Magistrate Judge Carlson did not properly apply the standard for summary judgment because Magistrate Judge Carlson failed to consider certain differences in Plaintiff's account of events and Defendants' account; and that (2) Magistrate Judge Carlson erred by failing to consider Plaintiff's unreasonable search claim related to the officers' search of his person and personal effects.1 (Doc. No. 116.)

The Court finds that Magistrate Judge Carlson correctly and comprehensively addressed the substance of Defendants' motion for summary judgment in his Report and Recommendation. The Court will not write separately to address Plaintiff's objections except as noted in the margin.

AND NOW, on this 31st day of March 2016, upon consideration of the parties' statements of material facts (Doc. Nos. 65, 82), the complete record, and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: