SOTTOSANTI-MACK v. REINHART, 15-3255. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160329d56
Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER HENRY S. PERKIN , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW , this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 3), which motion was filed by defendants on June 17, 2015; upon consideration of Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 4) filed August 12, 2015; upon consideration of the Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 7) filed on August 26, 2015; upon co
Summary: ORDER HENRY S. PERKIN , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW , this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 3), which motion was filed by defendants on June 17, 2015; upon consideration of Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 4) filed August 12, 2015; upon consideration of the Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 7) filed on August 26, 2015; upon con..
More
ORDER
HENRY S. PERKIN, Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 3), which motion was filed by defendants on June 17, 2015; upon consideration of Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 4) filed August 12, 2015; upon consideration of the Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 7) filed on August 26, 2015; upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Brief Contra Defendants' Reply Brief Concerning Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 10) filed on September 8, 2015; and for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum,
IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
1. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Count III of the Complaint.
2. The motion to dismiss is DENIED in all other respects, without prejudice to Defendants to raise the arguments therein in a motion for summary judgment after discovery has concluded.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to file an answer to the Complaint.
Source: Leagle
