TODD v. LUZERNE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES, 3:04-CV-02637. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120411951
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW this 10 th day of April, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment to Include Interest for Eleven Years (Doc. 212) is DENIED; (2) Plaintiff's Motion to Require Defendants to File a Bond Under Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure or, in the Alternative, to Amend Judgment (Doc. 203) is DENIED as moot; and (3) Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Judgment to Include In
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW this 10 th day of April, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment to Include Interest for Eleven Years (Doc. 212) is DENIED; (2) Plaintiff's Motion to Require Defendants to File a Bond Under Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure or, in the Alternative, to Amend Judgment (Doc. 203) is DENIED as moot; and (3) Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Judgment to Include Int..
More
ORDER
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
NOW this 10th day of April, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment to Include Interest for Eleven Years (Doc. 212) is DENIED;
(2) Plaintiff's Motion to Require Defendants to File a Bond Under Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure or, in the Alternative, to Amend Judgment (Doc. 203) is DENIED as moot; and
(3) Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Judgment to Include Interest for Eleven Years (Doc. 214) is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
