Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ROBERTS TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. v. CURWOOD, INC., 14-5677. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150924c89 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 23 rd day of September 2015, upon consideration of the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 43), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 58), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 68), following Oral Argument and as detailed in the accompanying Opinion, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 43) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's breach
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of September 2015, upon consideration of the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 43), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 58), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 68), following Oral Argument and as detailed in the accompanying Opinion, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 43) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:

1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's breach of contract claims under Counts I and II (as subsumed in Count I) alleging damages arising from Defendant's alleged contacts with customers in breach of a promise to "protect" customers before the parties' agreement terminated on a now unknown date. We find genuine issues of material fact as to the events occurring before the termination of the parties' agreements; the meaning of "protect" in the promise; and, the precise date the parties' agreement as to any contacted customer terminated;

2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED on all other claims in the Complaint and all of Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer