Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

10191-10194 (1950)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 10191-10194 Visitors: 31
Filed: Dec. 06, 1950
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 186 F.2d 120 TIVOLI REALTY, Inc. v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al., Interstate Circuit, Inc., and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., appellants. TIVOLI REALTY, Inc. v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.; Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Loew's Inc.; Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.; RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp.; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.; Columbia Pictures Corp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures
More

186 F.2d 120

TIVOLI REALTY, Inc.
v.
PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al., Interstate Circuit, Inc.,
and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., appellants.
TIVOLI REALTY, Inc.
v.
PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.;
Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Loew's Inc.;
Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.; RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.; Warner
Bros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing
Corp.; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.; Columbia Pictures
Corp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures, Inc., and
Universal Film Exchange, Inc., appellants.
I. B. ADELMAN
v.
PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Interstate Circuit, Inc.
and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., appellants.
I. B. ADELMAN
v.
PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.;
Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Lowe's Inc.;
Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.; RKO Radio Pictures, Inc,; Warner
Bros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing
Corp.; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.; Columbia Pictures
Corp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures, Inc., and
Universal Film Exchange, Inc., appellants.

Nos. 10191-10194.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 3, 1950.
Decided Dec. 6, 1950.

Robert E. Sher, Washington, D.C., Roy McDonald, New York City (Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Del., Hastings, Stockly, Walz & Wise, Wilmington, Del., Morris Steel, Nichols & Arsht, Wilmington, Del., Southerland, Berl & Potter, Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellants.

Thurman Arnold, Washington, D.C. (Killoran & VanBrunt, Wilmington, Del., Arnold, Fortas & Porter, Washington, D.C., Thompson, Meek & Goldberg, Dallas, Tex., on the brief), for appellees.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The order complained of is not appealable under Section 1291 or Section 1292, Title 28 United States Code Annotated. See the opinion filed concurrently with this in Paramount Pictures, Inc., v. Rodney, 186 F.2d 111, petitions for mandamus.

2

The appeals will be dismissed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer