Noonan v. Kane, 15-6082. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191106f26
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiffs Frank Noonan, Randy Feathers, Richard A. Sheetz, Jr., E. Marc Constanzo, and Frank Fina to compel discovery of attorney communications and work-product (Doc. # 106) is DENIED.
ORDER
HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiffs Frank Noonan, Randy Feathers, Richard A. Sheetz, Jr., E. Marc Constanzo, and Frank Fina to compel discovery of attorney communications and work-product (Doc. # 106) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
