U.S. v. FRISBY, 11-564-05. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120711c14
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge. AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of defendant William Frisby for a judgment of acquittal, incorrectly denominated a motion for a new trial, pursuant to Rule 29(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Doc. #375) is DENIED.
ORDER
HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of defendant William Frisby for a judgment of acquittal, incorrectly denominated a motion for a new trial, pursuant to Rule 29(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Doc. #375) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
