Filed: Feb. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES, II , District Judge . AND NOW, this 7 th day of February, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants Jemal's Mickelson, LLC and Douglas Development Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Transfer to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (ECF No. 7), and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 9), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. For the reasons stated in the accompany
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES, II , District Judge . AND NOW, this 7 th day of February, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants Jemal's Mickelson, LLC and Douglas Development Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Transfer to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (ECF No. 7), and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 9), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. For the reasons stated in the accompanyi..
More
ORDER
C. DARNELL JONES, II, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants Jemal's Mickelson, LLC and Douglas Development Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Transfer to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (ECF No. 7), and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 9), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, venue is improper in this district, and the Clerk of Court shall accordingly TRANSFER this matter to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). Defendants' alternative request for transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) is therefore DENIED as moot.
