Filed: Jan. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2016, in consideration of the following Motions, all Responses and Replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Maine Antique Digest, Kate Pennington, S. Clayton Pennington, and Lita Solis-Cohen (Document #25) is GRANTED. 2. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Pook & Pook, LLC, Debra Pook, James, Pook, Ron Pook, and Jamie Shearer (Document #26) is GRANTED. 3
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2016, in consideration of the following Motions, all Responses and Replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Maine Antique Digest, Kate Pennington, S. Clayton Pennington, and Lita Solis-Cohen (Document #25) is GRANTED. 2. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Pook & Pook, LLC, Debra Pook, James, Pook, Ron Pook, and Jamie Shearer (Document #26) is GRANTED. 3...
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2016, in consideration of the following Motions, all Responses and Replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Maine Antique Digest, Kate Pennington, S. Clayton Pennington, and Lita Solis-Cohen (Document #25) is GRANTED.
2. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Pook & Pook, LLC, Debra Pook, James, Pook, Ron Pook, and Jamie Shearer (Document #26) is GRANTED.
3. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Jay Lowe and Connie and Jay Lowe Antiques (Document #27) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED as to as to Count II (Lanham Act), Count III (unfair competition), Count IV (antitrust claims), Count V (commercial disparagement), Count VI (false light), Count VII (injurious falsehood), Count VIII (breach of fiduciary duty), and Count X (breach of contract) of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. The Motion is DENIED as to Count I (conspiracy), Count IX (negligence), and Count XI (unjust enrichment).
4. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Mike Caffarella (Document #30) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED as to as to Count II (Lanham Act), Count III (unfair competition), Count IV (antitrust claims), Count V (commercial disparagement), Count VI (false light), Count VII (injurious falsehood), and Count X (breach of contract) of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. The Motion is DENIED as to Count I (conspiracy), Count VIII (breach of fiduciary duty), Count IX (negligence), and Count XI (unjust enrichment).
