WILBANKS v. SIMMONS, 1:13cv167. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140910997
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. On August 18, 2014, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 31) was filed and a copy mailed to the parties in the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. No objections were received within the time prescribed by section 636. The court need not, therefore, conduct a de novo review, and the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) is DEN
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. On August 18, 2014, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 31) was filed and a copy mailed to the parties in the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. No objections were received within the time prescribed by section 636. The court need not, therefore, conduct a de novo review, and the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) is DENI..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
On August 18, 2014, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 31) was filed and a copy mailed to the parties in the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections were received within the time prescribed by section 636.
The court need not, therefore, conduct a de novo review, and the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
