Filed: Dec. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff Suzana Vangjeli's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 20), the defendants' response thereto (Doc. No 21), the defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 22), and Ms. Vangjeli's response thereto (Doc. No. 23), it is ORDERED, as outlined in the Court's accompanying Memorandum, that: 1. Ms. Vangjeli's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED; and 2. The defendants' Motion to Compel (
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff Suzana Vangjeli's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 20), the defendants' response thereto (Doc. No 21), the defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 22), and Ms. Vangjeli's response thereto (Doc. No. 23), it is ORDERED, as outlined in the Court's accompanying Memorandum, that: 1. Ms. Vangjeli's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED; and 2. The defendants' Motion to Compel (D..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff Suzana Vangjeli's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 20), the defendants' response thereto (Doc. No 21), the defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 22), and Ms. Vangjeli's response thereto (Doc. No. 23), it is ORDERED, as outlined in the Court's accompanying Memorandum, that:
1. Ms. Vangjeli's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED; and
2. The defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
