Muhammad v. Brittain, 17-cv-2504. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20181024f22
Visitors: 34
Filed: Oct. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES , District Judge . AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED. 3. There is n
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES , District Judge . AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED. 3. There is no..
More
ORDER
C. DARNELL JONES, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
