U.S. v. Netus, 17-172. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20181115e44
Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. PADOVA , District Judge . AND NOW , this 13th day of November, 2018, upon consideration of Peterly Netus's pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Crim. Docket No. 21) and all documents filed in connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED . As Netus has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, there is no
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. PADOVA , District Judge . AND NOW , this 13th day of November, 2018, upon consideration of Peterly Netus's pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Crim. Docket No. 21) and all documents filed in connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED . As Netus has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, there is no ..
More
ORDER
JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2018, upon consideration of Peterly Netus's pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Crim. Docket No. 21) and all documents filed in connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. As Netus has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, there is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE Civil Action No. 18-3087.
Source: Leagle
