Matthew B. v. Pleasant Valley School District, 3:17-CV-2380. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191108a64
Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 31 st DAY OF OCTOBER 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. 33) is DENIED; 2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. 30) is GRANTED as provided in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 hereof; 3. The Hearing Officer's decision with respect to the denial
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 31 st DAY OF OCTOBER 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. 33) is DENIED; 2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. 30) is GRANTED as provided in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 hereof; 3. The Hearing Officer's decision with respect to the denial o..
More
ORDER
ROBERT D. MARIANI, District Judge.
AND NOW, THIS 31st DAY OF OCTOBER 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. 33) is DENIED;
2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. 30) is GRANTED as provided in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 hereof;
3. The Hearing Officer's decision with respect to the denial of a free appropriate public education is AFFIRMED;
4. The Hearing Officer's decision with respect to compensatory education is REVERSED;
5. This case is REMANDED to the Hearing Officer for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion;
6. All proceedings undertaken with the Hearing Officer, together with the Hearing Officer's determination of an appropriate remedy, shall be completed within 90 days of this Order;
7. Either party may seek review of the Hearing Officer's decision by motion to this Court within 90 days of the Hearing Officer's ruling;
8. The Court RESERVES judgment on the issue of Plaintiffs' counsel's attorneys' fees subject to a proper petition of attorneys' fees following the Hearing Officer's decision at the conclusion of this case.
Source: Leagle
