Dyer v. City of Gastonia, 3:15-CV-033-MOC-DCK. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160331h27
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff's "Notice Of Request For Judicial Settlement Conference" (Document No. 28) filed March 23, 2016. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will respectfully deny the motion. The undersigned observes that the pending motion was filed less
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff's "Notice Of Request For Judicial Settlement Conference" (Document No. 28) filed March 23, 2016. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will respectfully deny the motion. The undersigned observes that the pending motion was filed less ..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff's "Notice Of Request For Judicial Settlement Conference" (Document No. 28) filed March 23, 2016. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will respectfully deny the motion.
The undersigned observes that the pending motion was filed less than a month prior to the trial date. As such, it is impossible for the Court to follow its usual procedures to hold a Judicial Settlement Conference, not least of which includes securing appropriate space in the courthouse. Moreover, the motion fails to satisfy the consultation requirement of Local Rule 7.1(B). The Court has since been informed that Defendant does not believe a Judicial Settlement Conference would be productive.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Notice Of Request For Judicial Settlement Conference" (Document No. 28) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
