AUSTERMILLER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 3:10cv1697. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120313a48
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge. On de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the Commissioner having informed the Court that there is no objection to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED THAT the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is adopted as the Order of this Court. I award Plaintiff $927.70 in compensation for underpayment by the Social Security Administration and deny his motion for EAJA attorne
Summary: ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge. On de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the Commissioner having informed the Court that there is no objection to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED THAT the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is adopted as the Order of this Court. I award Plaintiff $927.70 in compensation for underpayment by the Social Security Administration and deny his motion for EAJA attorney..
More
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.
On de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the Commissioner having informed the Court that there is no objection to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby
ORDERED THAT the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is adopted as the Order of this Court.
I award Plaintiff $927.70 in compensation for underpayment by the Social Security Administration and deny his motion for EAJA attorney fees and costs.
The Clerk shall prepare an Entry of Judgement accordingly.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
