STATE v. CALDERON, 30 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20110616277
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 31, 2011
Latest Update: May 31, 2011
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge. Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. JAMES J. WECHSLER, and TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judges conc
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge. Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. JAMES J. WECHSLER, and TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judges concu..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, and TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judges concur.
Source: Leagle
