THOMAS v. U.S., 3:15-0434. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150706e24
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER MALACHY E. MANNION , District Judge . In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) the report of Judge Saporito, (Doc. 11) , is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY ; (2) the petition is DISMISSED without prejudice to the petitioner's right to file a 2255 motion in the sentencing court, subject to the pre-authorization requirements of 28 U.S.C. 2244 and 2255(h), as they may apply; and (3) the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CA
Summary: ORDER MALACHY E. MANNION , District Judge . In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) the report of Judge Saporito, (Doc. 11) , is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY ; (2) the petition is DISMISSED without prejudice to the petitioner's right to file a 2255 motion in the sentencing court, subject to the pre-authorization requirements of 28 U.S.C. 2244 and 2255(h), as they may apply; and (3) the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CAS..
More
ORDER
MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge.
In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
(1) the report of Judge Saporito, (Doc. 11), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;
(2) the petition is DISMISSED without prejudice to the petitioner's right to file a §2255 motion in the sentencing court, subject to the pre-authorization requirements of 28 U.S.C. §§2244 and 2255(h), as they may apply; and
(3) the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
Source: Leagle
