U.S. v. CANNON, 06-258 (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120622d12
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, Judge. AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Components (1) and (6) of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (Document No. 145), the government's response, and it appearing that the defendant's motion is a successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2255, it is ORDERED that the motion is TRANSFERRED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631, to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to determine whethe
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, Judge. AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Components (1) and (6) of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (Document No. 145), the government's response, and it appearing that the defendant's motion is a successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2255, it is ORDERED that the motion is TRANSFERRED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631, to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to determine whether..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, Judge.
AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Components (1) and (6) of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (Document No. 145), the government's response, and it appearing that the defendant's motion is a successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, it is ORDERED that the motion is TRANSFERRED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to determine whether the district court may consider the defendant's successive petition.
Source: Leagle
