BLUNDELL v. COLVIN, 13-CV-372-JHP-KEW. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20150313c54
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES H. PAYNE , District Judge . On February 17, 2015 the United States Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation in regard to Plaintiff's request for judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge be reversed and the case be remanded to the Administrative L
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES H. PAYNE , District Judge . On February 17, 2015 the United States Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation in regard to Plaintiff's request for judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge be reversed and the case be remanded to the Administrative La..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JAMES H. PAYNE, District Judge.
On February 17, 2015 the United States Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation in regard to Plaintiff's request for judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge be reversed and the case be remanded to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings consistent with this Order. The Commissioner has not filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation within the time prescribed by law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).
This Court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is supported by the record. Therefore, upon full consideration of the entire record and the issues presented herein, the Court finds and orders that the Report and Recommendation entered by the United States Magistrate Judge on January 26, 2015, be AFFIRMED and ADOPTED by this Court as its Findings and Order and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle