JENKINS-BROWN v. LIBERTY ACQUISITIONS SERVICING, LLC, 03:14-CV-01610-ST. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20150918850
Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings & Recommendation (#55) on July 29, 2015, in which she recommends the Court deny Defendant's summary judgment motion. Defendant has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court mus
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings & Recommendation (#55) on July 29, 2015, in which she recommends the Court deny Defendant's summary judgment motion. Defendant has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings & Recommendation (#55) on July 29, 2015, in which she recommends the Court deny Defendant's summary judgment motion. Defendant has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Defendant's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings & Recommendation [55], and therefore, Defendant's summary judgment motion [31] is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
