Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BRADLEY v. POWELL, 15-04025. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150921c70 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW , this 18th day of September, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (ECF No. 2), Plaintiff's response in opposition (ECF No. 4), and Defendant's reply thereto (ECF No. 5), it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE so that Plaintiff may engage in jurisdictional discovery limited to the issue of whether Defendant has minimum co
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (ECF No. 2), Plaintiff's response in opposition (ECF No. 4), and Defendant's reply thereto (ECF No. 5), it is ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE so that Plaintiff may engage in jurisdictional discovery limited to the issue of whether Defendant has minimum contacts in Pennsylvania; 2. All jurisdictional discovery shall be completed by October 19, 2015; and 3. To the extent that Defendant desires to renew his Motion after jurisdictional discovery has closed, he shall do so by no later than October 30, 2015. Plaintiff may file a response by November 16, 2015.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer