Filed: Jun. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER RENEE MARIE BUMB, District Judge. THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon a motion for summary judgment by Defendant Medco Health Solutions of Willingboro, Inc. ("Defendant"), [Dkt. Ent. 52]; and THE COURT NOTING that it previously reserved judgment on Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Count III of Coalet Lowe's ("Plaintiff") Amended Complaint; and THE COURT FURTHER NOTING that Defendant seeks both (1) summary judgment on Count III of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint; and (
Summary: ORDER RENEE MARIE BUMB, District Judge. THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon a motion for summary judgment by Defendant Medco Health Solutions of Willingboro, Inc. ("Defendant"), [Dkt. Ent. 52]; and THE COURT NOTING that it previously reserved judgment on Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Count III of Coalet Lowe's ("Plaintiff") Amended Complaint; and THE COURT FURTHER NOTING that Defendant seeks both (1) summary judgment on Count III of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint; and (2..
More
ORDER
RENEE MARIE BUMB, District Judge.
THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon a motion for summary judgment by Defendant Medco Health Solutions of Willingboro, Inc. ("Defendant"), [Dkt. Ent. 52]; and
THE COURT NOTING that it previously reserved judgment on Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Count III of Coalet Lowe's ("Plaintiff") Amended Complaint; and
THE COURT FURTHER NOTING that Defendant seeks both (1) summary judgment on Count III of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint; and (2) and denial of punitive damages as a remedy for Count II and III of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint; and
THE COURT having considered the moving papers, as well as those submitted in opposition and reply, and all accompanying materials including supplementary briefings; and
FOR THE REASONS set forth in the Opinion issued herewith,
IT IS on this 19th day of June 2012, hereby ORDERED that the Court denies Defendant's motion for summary judgment with respect to Count III, which alleges a violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, and denies Defendant's motion to preclude Plaintiff from seeking punitive damages.
