Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ponca Machine Company, Inc. v. Emcasco Insurance Company, CIV-18-958-D. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Number: infdco20181101d62 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant EMCASCO Insurance Company's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6]. The Motion challenges the sufficiency of Plaintiff's original pleading. In response to the Motion, Plaintiff has timely filed an amended pleading as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). This amendment "supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect." Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515 , 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (internal
More

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant EMCASCO Insurance Company's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6]. The Motion challenges the sufficiency of Plaintiff's original pleading. In response to the Motion, Plaintiff has timely filed an amended pleading as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). This amendment "supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect." Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (internal quotation omitted); see Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180-81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007). Thus, Defendant's Motion is moot.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant EMCASCO Insurance Company's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6] is DENIED without prejudice to resubmission, if appropriate, in response to the First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 10].

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer