Lothridge v. Berryhill, 5:17-3452-RMG (2018)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20180823g72
Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER RICHARD MARK GERGEL , District Judge . Plaintiff filed this action seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration's denial of his application for disability benefits. Following Plaintiffs submission of his brief asserting various errors of law and the absence of substantial evidence in the denial of benefits, the Commissioner moved, with the consent of Plaintiff, to have the administrative decision reversed and the matter remanded to the agency for further proceedings.
Summary: ORDER RICHARD MARK GERGEL , District Judge . Plaintiff filed this action seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration's denial of his application for disability benefits. Following Plaintiffs submission of his brief asserting various errors of law and the absence of substantial evidence in the denial of benefits, the Commissioner moved, with the consent of Plaintiff, to have the administrative decision reversed and the matter remanded to the agency for further proceedings. (..
More
ORDER
RICHARD MARK GERGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration's denial of his application for disability benefits. Following Plaintiffs submission of his brief asserting various errors of law and the absence of substantial evidence in the denial of benefits, the Commissioner moved, with the consent of Plaintiff, to have the administrative decision reversed and the matter remanded to the agency for further proceedings. (Dkt. No. 25). The motion is granted. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remanded to the agency for further administrative proceedings.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
