Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LEE v. LAMPERT, 633 F.3d 1176 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: infco20110208148 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 08, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2011
Summary: ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer