MOORE v. COLVIN, CIV-13-1121-F. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20150312e75
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER STEPHEN P. FRIOT , District Judge . Plaintiff Timothy Moore brings this action seeking judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) of the final decision of the defendant Commissioner denying plaintiff's applications for benefits under the Social Security Act. Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin issued a Report and Recommendation on February 23, 2015, doc. no. 13, (the Report), recommending that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and remanded for further consideration consistent wit
Summary: ORDER STEPHEN P. FRIOT , District Judge . Plaintiff Timothy Moore brings this action seeking judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) of the final decision of the defendant Commissioner denying plaintiff's applications for benefits under the Social Security Act. Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin issued a Report and Recommendation on February 23, 2015, doc. no. 13, (the Report), recommending that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and remanded for further consideration consistent with..
More
ORDER
STEPHEN P. FRIOT, District Judge.
Plaintiff Timothy Moore brings this action seeking judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g) of the final decision of the defendant Commissioner denying plaintiff's applications for benefits under the Social Security Act. Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin issued a Report and Recommendation on February 23, 2015, doc. no. 13, (the Report), recommending that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and remanded for further consideration consistent with the Report. The Report advised the parties of their right to file written objections to the Report by March 9, 2015. The Report also advised that failure to make timely objection to the Report waives appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report. Neither party has filed an objection to the Report, and neither party has requested an extension of time within which to file any objection to the Report.
With no objection being filed, and having reviewed the Report, the record, and the relevant arguments and authorities, the court finds that no purpose would be served by setting out any further analysis here and that the Report should be adopted in its entirety.
The court ACCEPTS, AFFIRMS, and ADOPTS the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as stated in the Report. The Commissioner's decision denying benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED.
Source: Leagle
