Moneyham v. Ebbert, 3:16cv211. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20181127c97
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW , to wit, this 26 th day of November 2018, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. 16) to the report and recommendation are hereby OVERRULED ; 2) The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED ; 3) The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DENIED ; 4) Because of the reasoning in the attached memorandum we decline to issue a certificate of appeala
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW , to wit, this 26 th day of November 2018, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. 16) to the report and recommendation are hereby OVERRULED ; 2) The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED ; 3) The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DENIED ; 4) Because of the reasoning in the attached memorandum we decline to issue a certificate of appealab..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, to wit, this 26th day of November 2018, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. 16) to the report and recommendation are hereby OVERRULED;
2) The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED;
3) The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED;
4) Because of the reasoning in the attached memorandum we decline to issue a certificate of appealability; and
5) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
Source: Leagle
