Brunelle v. City of Scranton, 3:15-CV-960. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180824975
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 3rd DAY OF AUGUST, 2018, upon review of Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 74) for clear error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. 74) is ADOPTED for the reasons set forth therein. 2. Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 44) is DENIED with respect to all claims except for Plaintiff's Taking Clause claim contained within Count V of the Amend
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 3rd DAY OF AUGUST, 2018, upon review of Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 74) for clear error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. 74) is ADOPTED for the reasons set forth therein. 2. Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 44) is DENIED with respect to all claims except for Plaintiff's Taking Clause claim contained within Count V of the Amende..
More
ORDER
ROBERT D. MARIANI, District Judge.
AND NOW, THIS 3rd DAY OF AUGUST, 2018, upon review of Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 74) for clear error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. 74) is ADOPTED for the reasons set forth therein.
2. Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 44) is DENIED with respect to all claims except for Plaintiff's Taking Clause claim contained within Count V of the Amended Complaint.
3. Plaintiff's Takings Clause claim in Count V of the Amended Complaint is STAYED pending the Supreme Court's decision in Knick v. Twp. of Scott, 138 S.Ct. 1262.
Source: Leagle
