HUMPHREYS v. PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION, 12-4334. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141103916
Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge. AND NOW, this 30 th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of all pending Motions to Dismiss and Memoranda of Law in Support, as well as Plaintiffs' responses to said motions, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Michelle LaWall, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Docket No. 41) is GRANTED and PPL and LaWall are dismissed from this action wi
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge. AND NOW, this 30 th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of all pending Motions to Dismiss and Memoranda of Law in Support, as well as Plaintiffs' responses to said motions, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Michelle LaWall, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Docket No. 41) is GRANTED and PPL and LaWall are dismissed from this action wit..
More
ORDER
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of all pending Motions to Dismiss and Memoranda of Law in Support, as well as Plaintiffs' responses to said motions, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Michelle LaWall, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Docket No. 41) is GRANTED and PPL and LaWall are dismissed from this action with prejudice;
2. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants, Northampton County Department of Human Services, Northampton County Area Agency on Aging and Barbara Kleintop (Docket No. 40), is GRANTED and Northampton County Department of Human Services, Northampton County Agency on Aging and Kleintop are dismissed from this action with prejudice;
3. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants, City of Bethlehem, PA, Police Department, et al (Docket No. 39), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;
4. The allegations of violations of §1985(3) against the Bethlehem defendants are dismissed with prejudice; and
5. The remaining portion of the Bethlehem defendants Motion to Dismiss pertaining to the §1983 claims is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
