Earls v. Superintendent SCI-Huntingdon, 18-1552. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191127i58
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES, II , District Judge . AND NOW this 25th day of November 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of: Anthony Wayne Earl's Petition For a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1); the Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 10); the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (ECF No. 11); Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 16); and, the Response to Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 20), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. In accordance
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES, II , District Judge . AND NOW this 25th day of November 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of: Anthony Wayne Earl's Petition For a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1); the Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 10); the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (ECF No. 11); Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 16); and, the Response to Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 20), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. In accordance w..
More
ORDER
C. DARNELL JONES, II, District Judge.
AND NOW this 25th day of November 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of: Anthony Wayne Earl's Petition For a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1); the Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 10); the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (ECF No. 11); Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 16); and, the Response to Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 20), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. In accordance with this Court's accompanying Memorandum, Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 16) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED;
4. A Certificate of Appealability shall NOT ISSUE; and,
5. The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter CLOSED.
FootNotes
1. This Court presents the caption exactly as it appears on the docket.
Source: Leagle
