Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ruth E. Fulton v. American Sugar Refining Company, 12862_1 (1959)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 12862_1 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 29, 1959
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 270 F.2d 390 Ruth E. FULTON, Appellant, v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY. No. 12862. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Sept. 24, 1959. Decided Sept. 29, 1959. Andrew J. Transue, Flint, Mich. (Frank J. Eustace, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., Rene J. Ortlieb, Flint, Mich., on the brief), for appellant. Samuel B. Fortenbaugh, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Herbert G. Schick, Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE
More

270 F.2d 390

Ruth E. FULTON, Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY.

No. 12862.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 24, 1959.
Decided Sept. 29, 1959.

Andrew J. Transue, Flint, Mich. (Frank J. Eustace, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., Rene J. Ortlieb, Flint, Mich., on the brief), for appellant.

Samuel B. Fortenbaugh, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Herbert G. Schick, Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the plaintiff's motion to set aside a default judgment and reinstate the case for trial. The only ground which the plaintiff can rely on is Rule 60(b)(6), 28 U.S.C.A.

2

We have examined and considered the facts of the case. We do not find any basis on which we can say that the discretion of the trial court was improperly exercised.

3

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer