James v. Varano, 1:14-cv-01951. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180326b51
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER YVETTE KANE , District Judge . AND NOW , on this 23rd day of March 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT : 1. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 135), is DENIED as MOOT ; 2. Plaintiff's motion to file a sur-reply brief (Doc. No. 138), is DENIED ; 3. Medical Defendants Brian Davis and Jennifer Daya's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 103), is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to a
Summary: ORDER YVETTE KANE , District Judge . AND NOW , on this 23rd day of March 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT : 1. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 135), is DENIED as MOOT ; 2. Plaintiff's motion to file a sur-reply brief (Doc. No. 138), is DENIED ; 3. Medical Defendants Brian Davis and Jennifer Daya's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 103), is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to a s..
More
ORDER
YVETTE KANE, District Judge.
AND NOW, on this 23rd day of March 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 135), is DENIED as MOOT;
2. Plaintiff's motion to file a sur-reply brief (Doc. No. 138), is DENIED;
3. Medical Defendants Brian Davis and Jennifer Daya's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 103), is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to a serious medical need claim. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants Davis and Daya and against Plaintiff on this Count;
4. The Corrections Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 113), is GRANTED as follows:
a. Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Corrections Defendants with respect to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to a serious medical need claim and as to all claims against Corrections Defendants Kulenguskey and Krzykowski. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT in favor of Corrections Defendants and against Plaintiff on these Counts;
b. Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Corrections Defendants Moser, Tripp, and Else with respect to Plaintiff's retaliation, verbal harassment, and conspiracy claims. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT in favor of Corrections Defendants Moser, Tripp, and Else and against Plaintiff on these Counts; and
5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.
Source: Leagle
