Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Adolph Hohensee v. J. Julius Levy, 13114_1 (1960)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 13114_1 Visitors: 44
Filed: Sep. 22, 1960
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 282 F.2d 564 Adolph HOHENSEE, Appellant v. J. Julius LEVY. No. 13114. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Sept. 13, 1960. Decided Sept. 22, 1960. James C. Newton, Washington, D.C., for appellant. William D. Morgan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Scranton, Pa. (Daniel H. Jenkins, U.S. Atty., Scranton, Pa., on the brief), forBefore GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 There is no jurisdiction for a federal court in this case. The complaint shows that both plaintiff an
More

282 F.2d 564

Adolph HOHENSEE, Appellant
v.
J. Julius LEVY.

No. 13114.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 13, 1960.
Decided Sept. 22, 1960.

James C. Newton, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

William D. Morgan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Scranton, Pa. (Daniel H. Jenkins, U.S. Atty., Scranton, Pa., on the brief), forBefore GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

There is no jurisdiction for a federal court in this case. The complaint shows that both plaintiff and defendant are residents of Pennsylvania. The subject matter is a claimed tort which is alleged to have taken place in Pennsylvania. Since, under the statutes, there is no jurisdiction for a federal court to act, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer