BAINBRIDGE v. ACME MARKETS, INC., 09-4683. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120316d33
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER EDMUND V. LUDWIG, Judge. AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2012, the following are denied: • "Objections of Plaintiff Valerie Bainbridge to the July 15, 2011 Order of Magistrate Judge Caracappa on Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions" (doc. no. 54). • The objections set forth in "Defendant Acme Markets, Inc.'s Response to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge Caracappa's Order of July 15, 2011" (doc. no. 55). • The objections set forth in "Opposition of Plaintiff Valerie Bainbridge t
Summary: ORDER EDMUND V. LUDWIG, Judge. AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2012, the following are denied: • "Objections of Plaintiff Valerie Bainbridge to the July 15, 2011 Order of Magistrate Judge Caracappa on Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions" (doc. no. 54). • The objections set forth in "Defendant Acme Markets, Inc.'s Response to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge Caracappa's Order of July 15, 2011" (doc. no. 55). • The objections set forth in "Opposition of Plaintiff Valerie Bainbridge to..
More
ORDER
EDMUND V. LUDWIG, Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2012, the following are denied:
• "Objections of Plaintiff Valerie Bainbridge to the July 15, 2011 Order of Magistrate Judge Caracappa on Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions" (doc. no. 54).
• The objections set forth in "Defendant Acme Markets, Inc.'s Response to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge Caracappa's Order of July 15, 2011" (doc. no. 55).
• The objections set forth in "Opposition of Plaintiff Valerie Bainbridge to Defendant Acme Markets, Inc.'s Untimely Appeal of Magistrate Judge Caracappa's Order of July 15, 2011" (doc. no. 56).
• "Defendant Acme Markets, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment" (doc. no. 35).
• "Motion of Plaintiff Valerie Bainbridge for Partial Summary Judgment on Count III of Her Complaint for Unpaid Overtime Pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act" (doc. no. 36).
As to the defense of statute of limitations under the PHRA, §§ 43 P.S. 951-963 and the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, the factual records have not been fully developed and, therefore, these rulings will be reserved until trial.
Source: Leagle
