Filed: Feb. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW , this 27th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant Frank Regan's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 94), Plaintiff Shawn T. Walker's Brief in Opposition (Doc. No. 104), Mr. Walker's Declaration (Doc. No. 105), and Mr. Regan's Reply (Docket No. 108), it is ORDERED that, as outlined in the Court's February 27, 2019 memorandum, the Motion (Doc. No. 94) is GRANTED as to Mr. Walker's 2013 retaliation claim and DENIED as
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW , this 27th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant Frank Regan's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 94), Plaintiff Shawn T. Walker's Brief in Opposition (Doc. No. 104), Mr. Walker's Declaration (Doc. No. 105), and Mr. Regan's Reply (Docket No. 108), it is ORDERED that, as outlined in the Court's February 27, 2019 memorandum, the Motion (Doc. No. 94) is GRANTED as to Mr. Walker's 2013 retaliation claim and DENIED as ..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant Frank Regan's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 94), Plaintiff Shawn T. Walker's Brief in Opposition (Doc. No. 104), Mr. Walker's Declaration (Doc. No. 105), and Mr. Regan's Reply (Docket No. 108), it is ORDERED that, as outlined in the Court's February 27, 2019 memorandum, the Motion (Doc. No. 94) is GRANTED as to Mr. Walker's 2013 retaliation claim and DENIED as to Mr. Walker's 2014 retaliation claim and Mr. Walker's request for punitive damages.
