ESTRADA v. WASS, 3:10-CV-1560. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120417c59
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW this 16 th day of April, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Flying J Defendants shall reproduce an adequate representative for deposition on the matters contained within the Plaintiff's Notice of 30 (b)(6) Deposition and Supplemental Notice of Deposition of Corporate Designees of Flying J Defendants dated September 14, 2011 and September 21, 2011, respectively; 2. The Flying J Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) will be HE
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW this 16 th day of April, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Flying J Defendants shall reproduce an adequate representative for deposition on the matters contained within the Plaintiff's Notice of 30 (b)(6) Deposition and Supplemental Notice of Deposition of Corporate Designees of Flying J Defendants dated September 14, 2011 and September 21, 2011, respectively; 2. The Flying J Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) will be HEL..
More
ORDER
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
NOW this 16th day of April, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Flying J Defendants shall reproduce an adequate representative for deposition on the matters contained within the Plaintiff's Notice of 30 (b)(6) Deposition and Supplemental Notice of Deposition of Corporate Designees of Flying J Defendants dated September 14, 2011 and September 21, 2011, respectively;
2. The Flying J Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) will be HELD IN ABEYANCE; and
3. Trial on this matter shall be CONTINUED.
Source: Leagle
