Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ash v. D.O.C., 3:17-CV-0957. (2020)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20200214g18 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2020
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 13th day of FEBRUARY 2020, upon consideration of Mr. Ash's third motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 58), it is ORDERED that: 1. Mr. Ash's motion (ECF No. 58) is DENIED without prejudice. 2. Mr. Ash shall respond to the Defendants' motions for summary judgment by Monday, April 20, 2020. 3. Mr. Ash's failure to oppose Defendants' motions for summary judgment will result in the Court deeming the motions unopposed.
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of FEBRUARY 2020, upon consideration of Mr. Ash's third motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 58), it is ORDERED that:

1. Mr. Ash's motion (ECF No. 58) is DENIED without prejudice. 2. Mr. Ash shall respond to the Defendants' motions for summary judgment by Monday, April 20, 2020. 3. Mr. Ash's failure to oppose Defendants' motions for summary judgment will result in the Court deeming the motions unopposed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e). 4. Defendants may file a reply brief within fourteen (14) days of receipt of Mr. Ash's opposition materials. 5. No further briefs may be filed without leave of court. 6. Mr. Ash is reminded of his obligation to inform the Court of his address changes. If the Court is unable to communicate with him due to his failure to provide a current address, the Court will deem Mr. Ash to have abandoned his lawsuit. (ECF No. 5.)
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer