Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JARAMILLO v. BANANA KING RESTAURANT CORP., 12-CV-5649 (NGG) (RML). (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. New York Number: infdco20140703f01 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. Plaintiff Fernan Jaramillo brought this action against Defendants Banana King Restaurant Corp., Banana King Corp., and Aries Vega on November 16, 2012, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201, et seq. , and several provisions of the New York Labor Law, alleging failure to pay Plaintiff minimum wage, overtime, and spread-of-hours wages and failure to provide notice of wages and employment terms and conditions. (Compl. (Dkt. 1).) After De
More

ORDER

NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Fernan Jaramillo brought this action against Defendants Banana King Restaurant Corp., Banana King Corp., and Aries Vega on November 16, 2012, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq., and several provisions of the New York Labor Law, alleging failure to pay Plaintiff minimum wage, overtime, and spread-of-hours wages and failure to provide notice of wages and employment terms and conditions. (Compl. (Dkt. 1).)

After Defendants failed to answer or appear in this case, Plaintiff moved for default judgment against all Defendants on December 12, 2013. (Pl. Mot. for Default J. (Dkt. 15).) On March 31, 2014, the court referred this motion to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy for a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(1) as to both liability and damages. (Dkt. 16.)

On June 4, 2014, having conducted a damages hearing, Judge Levy issued an R&R, recommending that Plaintiff's motion be granted, and that Plaintiff be awarded a total of $41,832.39, plus interest, consisting of $2,668.75 in unpaid minimum wages; $7,739.38 in unpaid overtime wages; $1,769 in unpaid spread-of-hours wages; $22,585.26 in liquidated damages; $5,000 in damages for wage and hour notice violations; $1,720 in attorney's fees; $350 in costs; and prejudgment interest at the rate of nine percent (9%) per annum. (R&R (Dkt. 19).)

No party has objected to Judge Levy's R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). (See also R&R at 16 ("Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of the Court, with courtesy copies to Judge Garaufis and to my chambers, within fourteen (14) days. Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court's order.").) Therefore, the court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Gesualdi v. Mack Excavation & Trailer Serv., Inc., No. 09-CV-2502 (KAM), 2010 WL 985294, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010); La Torres v. Walker, 216 F.Supp.2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000); cf. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Finding no clear error, the court adopts the R&R in full. See Porter v. Potter, 219 F. App'x 112 (2d Cir. 2007).

Accordingly, the court ADOPTS IN FULL the R&R and ENTERS default judgment against Defendants. The court AWARDS Plaintiff a total of $41,832.39, plus interest, consisting of $2,668.75 in unpaid minimum wages; $7,739.38 in unpaid overtime wages; $1,769 in unpaid spread-of-hours wages; $22,585.26 in liquidated damages; $5,000 in damages for wage and hour notice violations; $1,720 in attorney's fees; $350 in costs; and prejudgment interest at the rate of nine percent (9%) per annum.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer