Bryant v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 1:18-1782-BHH-SVH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20190426e15
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER SHIVA V. HODGES , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the court on a review of the docket in this case, which reveals that Plaintiff has failed to timely file her brief. Defendant filed an answer and the administrative record of the underlying proceedings on February 21, 2019. [ECF Nos. 13, 14]. Pursuant to Local Civ. Rule 83VII.04 (D.S.C.), Plaintiff's brief was originally due on March 25, 2019, but the undersigned granted Plaintiff an extension, which made her brief due by A
Summary: ORDER SHIVA V. HODGES , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the court on a review of the docket in this case, which reveals that Plaintiff has failed to timely file her brief. Defendant filed an answer and the administrative record of the underlying proceedings on February 21, 2019. [ECF Nos. 13, 14]. Pursuant to Local Civ. Rule 83VII.04 (D.S.C.), Plaintiff's brief was originally due on March 25, 2019, but the undersigned granted Plaintiff an extension, which made her brief due by Ap..
More
ORDER
SHIVA V. HODGES, Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the court on a review of the docket in this case, which reveals that Plaintiff has failed to timely file her brief. Defendant filed an answer and the administrative record of the underlying proceedings on February 21, 2019. [ECF Nos. 13, 14]. Pursuant to Local Civ. Rule 83VII.04 (D.S.C.), Plaintiff's brief was originally due on March 25, 2019, but the undersigned granted Plaintiff an extension, which made her brief due by April 24, 2019. [ECF No. 16]. Plaintiff has not yet filed a brief in this matter. As such, it appears to the court that Plaintiff wishes to abandon this action. Therefore, Plaintiff is directed to file a brief by April 29, 2019, and is warned that failure to file the brief by the revised final deadline may result in the case being recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
