Flores v. Pennsylvania, 18-0137. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190117c43
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK , District Judge . AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2019, upon consideration of (1) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Seeking to Exclude Evidence of Administrative Determination(s) and Notices (ECF No. 27); Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Claims Not Administratively Exhausted (ECF No. 28); and Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Comments or Conduct of a Sexual Nature (ECF No. 29); and all documents submitted in support the
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK , District Judge . AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2019, upon consideration of (1) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Seeking to Exclude Evidence of Administrative Determination(s) and Notices (ECF No. 27); Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Claims Not Administratively Exhausted (ECF No. 28); and Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Comments or Conduct of a Sexual Nature (ECF No. 29); and all documents submitted in support ther..
More
ORDER
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2019, upon consideration of (1) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Seeking to Exclude Evidence of Administrative Determination(s) and Notices (ECF No. 27); Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Claims Not Administratively Exhausted (ECF No. 28); and Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Comments or Conduct of a Sexual Nature (ECF No. 29); and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Seeking to Exclude Evidence of Administrative Determination(s) and Notices (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
A. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as it requests that Defendant be precluded from discussing the November 20, 2017 letter from the Department of Justice advising Plaintiff of her right to sue Defendant ("DOJ Letter"). Neither party may introduce evidence regarding the DOJ Letter or its lack of findings.
B. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects.
2. Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Claims Not Administratively Exhausted (ECF No. 28) is DENIED.
3. Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Comments or Conduct of a Sexual Nature (ECF No. 29) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
