Vito v. Rsui indemnity company, 19-1941. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20200129f29
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2020
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE , District Judge . NOW, this 27th day of January, 2020, consistent with the Memorandum Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the plaintiffs Robert Vito and Unequal Technologies Company and against the defendant RSUI Indemnity Company. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant RSUI Indemnity Company has a duty to defend the plaintiffs Robert Vito and Unequal Technologies Company in the action pending in the Common Pleas Co
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE , District Judge . NOW, this 27th day of January, 2020, consistent with the Memorandum Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the plaintiffs Robert Vito and Unequal Technologies Company and against the defendant RSUI Indemnity Company. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant RSUI Indemnity Company has a duty to defend the plaintiffs Robert Vito and Unequal Technologies Company in the action pending in the Common Pleas Cou..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge.
NOW, this 27th day of January, 2020, consistent with the Memorandum Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the plaintiffs Robert Vito and Unequal Technologies Company and against the defendant RSUI Indemnity Company.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant RSUI Indemnity Company has a duty to defend the plaintiffs Robert Vito and Unequal Technologies Company in the action pending in the Common Pleas Court of Chester County, Pennsylvania, captioned Joseph D'Ascenzo v. Unequal Technologies Company and Robert Vito and William Landman and Matscitechno Licensing Company, and INC International Company and Americ Investment, Inc. and V1 Capital, Inc., Case No. 2018-06104.
Source: Leagle
